Sikhism·Siree Raag·Shabad 95
Verse 1 of 5

The World Is Engrossed in Good Deeds and Bad Deeds

ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ ਮਹਲਾ ੫ ॥
sireeraag mehlaa 5.
Siree Raag, Fifth Mehl:
ਦੁਕ੍ਰਿਤ ਸੁਕ੍ਰਿਤ ਮੰਧੇ ਸੰਸਾਰੁ ਸਗਲਾਣਾ ॥
dukarit sukarit manDhay sansaar saglaanaa.
The whole world is engrossed in bad deeds and good deeds.
ਦੁਹਹੂੰ ਤੇ ਰਹਤ ਭਗਤੁ ਹੈ ਕੋਈ ਵਿਰਲਾ ਜਾਣਾ ॥੧॥
duhhooN tay rahat bhagat hai ko-ee virlaa jaanaa. ||1||
God's devotee is above both, but those who understand this are very rare. ||1||

Translation by Dr. Sant Singh Khalsa

In plain words

The world is engrossed in good deeds and bad deeds — and concerned with deliverance and bondage.

But God's devotee is above both good and bad deeds, and sees the essence of reality with an impartial vision.

The devotee is not concerned with deliverance or bondage, good or bad. A different register entirely.

God's devotee is above both good and bad deeds — acting from love rather than from fear or reward.
The deeper layer

This is one of the most theologically distinctive verses in Guru Arjan's Siree Raag — and in the entire Guru Granth Sahib. Most religious practice is organized around the opposition of good and bad deeds: do good, avoid bad, earn merit, escape demerit. Guru Arjan declares that God's true devotee is above this entire framework.

Sad Prabh ka sev (eternally serving God) puts a person in a different place: neither accumulating merit nor worried about sin. This is not moral nihilism — the devotee does not do bad things because they don't care. It is the recognition that the good-bad framework is the ego's map, not the divine's reality.

The tatv dristi (vision of the essence, impartial vision) — the devotee sees what is actually real, underneath the good-and-bad overlay.

Connections: Guru Nanak's teaching that the one operating in Hukam is beyond ordinary moral accounting. The Bhagavad Gita's sthitapragya (one of stable wisdom). The Christian mystical concept of purity of heart that sees God — beyond the distinction of reward and punishment.

The difficulty of this verse for family reading: it can be misread as permission for moral indifference. The clarification: it is about the motivation for action, not the absence of action. The devotee acts from love rather than from fear of punishment or desire for reward. The actions may look similar externally; the internal state is entirely different.

A Question to Sit With

What is the difference between doing something good because you're afraid of consequences, and doing the same thing because you genuinely love and want to? Does that difference matter? How?

Translation by Dr. Sant Singh Khalsa·How we use AI

About this bani →
Use ← → to navigate